Sofia Coppola: Not Quite the Actor, But One Hell of a Director
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
When I found out that we were going to be watching Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette (2006), I was quite excited that we'd be watching another film in film class (shocker, I know). But I was also internally giggling in my head, because whenever anyone mentions Sofia Coppola, I can't help but think of her infamous death scene in her father's film, The Godfather Part III.
I'll admit, having only watched that one particular scene out of the entire Godfather series, I never really took interest into the films and solely cared about Coppola's performance, which has been universally considered to be really bad acting. But for my own education purposes and this blog post, I figured that I'd look into her scenes in the movie to critique her acting and why some people (including me) would consider it bad acting.
The Godfather Part III: "Dad?"
Besides the infamous death scene, I watched a YouTube video that included every scene with Coppola's character, Mary Corleone. Judging from the scenes I've watched and the bare minimum level of comprehension I have of the movie plot, Mary is a caring daughter who wants to help her father and his philanthropy, but is also pursuing her first cousin, Vincent.
Before I say anything, I'm no expert on acting. I've only done a few shows before, but as a movie watcher, I think a person can tell when something in a movie is working for them or not, and Coppola's acting was one of them. To be honest, I think her physical acting was fine, especially her body language. But the thing that didn't work for me was her monotone and stagnant vocal delivery. Coppola's natural voice is similar, being low-pitched, monotoned, and soft spoken which honestly makes it soothing to listen to and work to bring out Mary's seductiveness. Unfortunately, that only works for the scenes that she's supposed to be seductive and soft spoken, and doesn't work elsewhere in the film. For example, in the scene where Mary is presenting a grant of $100,000,000 to the impoverished in Sicily, she gives a brief, but impressive explanation of her father's foundation, which is where the money is coming from. Saying big and witty statements like "$100,000,000 in the name of Vito Corleone" and "Don't spend it all in one place!" would probably result in some change of pitch and cadence in your voice. But not in Sofia Coppola's. Throughout the entire speech (and movie) her speech cadence was continuously slow and stagnant. Her pitch also didn't change much, only in volume did it ever change, which is really prominent, because since this is 19 year-old Coppola in 1990, she has a kind of vocal-fry, California-girl voice (which makes sense as she was raised in Rutherford, California) that doesn't change and honestly only becomes more irritating as the movie goes on.
Now onto the scene that inspired this entire blog post. In this scene, the Corleones are leaving an opera house after watching the performance of the only son, Anthony. As they are leaving, Mary stops her father on the stairs outside to confront her about his disapproval of seeing Vincent (again, her first cousin, so I think I'm gonna have to side with Al Pacino on this one). A hitman opens fire from afar, intending to kill Mary's dad, and shoots two bullets; one wounding her dad in the arm, and the other going into her chest. After getting shot, she takes a few steps towards her father, falls to her knees, calls for her dad's name, before dropping dead on her back.
Acting out a death, is probably considered one of the big scenarios that really tests an actor's abilities and talents, and boy did Coppola fail. In her defense, the way she executed Mary's death could have possibly been at the hands of the director (which is ironic because the director is her father, Francis Ford Coppola). But considering the bland acting in all the scenes prior to this one, I think it's fair to say that the way this death was executed was probably on the actress. From the moment Mary got shot to when she drops dead on the floor, there was literally no change of expression, and her final word of, "Dad?" is still in the same pitch, cadence and volume as her lines before.
I'm really trying to look from every angle to give Coppola the benefit of the doubt. As I said, her execution could have been due to the director's instructions, and I do think it's possible for someone to be in expressionless shock when they get shot. But goodness, the stiff walk to her dad, the long look at her wound, falling on her knees, and calling for her dad in again, the most monotoned voice ever. In my opinion, it was the most anticlimactic death ever, almost comical. And the only thing that made it somewhat salvageable was Al Pacino and Diane Keaton.
Coppola as an Auteur
Now that I kind of tore apart Coppola's acting, let me focus on her more successful career as a director. I've only seen one movie directed by her, but already from that film, I could tell that she has a very unique style. Looking into her other films like Somewhere (2010) and Lost in Translation (2003), she tends to put her characters in a "gilded cage," where her characters presumably seem like they have everything they need, but in reality don't have much freedom a/o joy within their luxury. Furthermore, her movie themes tend to go into topics that are quite progressive, like femininity, privilege, and loneliness. So I applaud her for making movies that make both her and the audience vulnerable.
Watching Marie Antoinette, I absolutely loved the aesthetics and overall look of the film. Coppola did really well in portraying the wealth and luxury of 18th century France. I also applaud her for developing Antoinette's confinement in her gilded cage. At first, I thought that the film was a bit slow and empty in terms of narrative and dialogue. But as the film rose to the climax, I think a lot of Antoinette's loneliness and loss of freedom was seamlessly integrated into the plot. By the end of the film, I was able to feel sympathy for Antoinette as she never was really able to escape her gilded cage. At least not without her head being chopped off.
At the end of the day, we can't be good at everything. But, instead of obsessing over what we're not good at, we can focus on things that we excel and are most comfortable in, which Sofia Coppola did. She went on to win an Oscar for Best Screenplay for Lost in Translation, and also became one of the first women to be nominated for Best Director. I guess like father, like daughter, huh?
Jaws (1975) Believe it or not , the first time I ever watched Jaws was last week, in my film class. I know, I know, I'm really late. But at least I have a one up on people when it comes to Hitchcock's Psycho, Vertigo, and Rear Window. That being said, I'll admit, I think the film really lives up to its fame. It was a lot more suspenseful and scary than I thought it'd be. Although I wasn't sure what I was expecting, it definitely was not graphic, bloody kills, a child victim, and an actual realistic looking shark. For 1975, Bruce (The Shark) looked pretty legit and I'll admit made me scream a few times. After watching and analyzing aspects of the film, something that stuck out to both me and my professor was how menacing and sharp Quint's eyes were during his Indianapolis speech. After looking into it a bit more, I made a connection between him and the shark that I thought worked in the storytelling and revealed deeper meaning behind Quint's characte...
Swiss Army Man (2016) Just last week, my film class watched probably what I'd consider to be the most bizarre film I've ever seen: Swiss Army Man (2016). Now I probably should not have been caught off guard that much, because the film was directed by The Daniels, the same duo who'd later go on to dominate the 2023 Academy Awards with their equally bizarre and mind-boggling film, Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022). To this day, I still can't comprehend that film, and ever since last week after watching Swiss Army Man , I still can't comprehend what to take from that film. But, similar to Everything Everywhere , I think I was able to take away some parts of the film and put meaning into them. So really, this blog post is just me trying to make sense of the film by talking through my thought process. Enjoy. Did Everything Actually Happen? The film starts off with Hank Thompson, played by Paul Dano, on the verge of ending his life after struggling to survive on ...
Recently, our film class had a group project where we got with other students to make a 2-5 minute short film. At first, many of us were concerned about how the heck we were gonna make a movie, with what camera, storyline, equipment, music, editing, and quite literally everything. But as my group started to plan out our film, we found that like many of the other groups, the creative juices just kept flowing. Not only were we able to figure out what our plot was going to be, but we were also able to visualize what scenes we wanted to film. The next thing we know, we were all looking forward to making a film. Now, would our film, "See-Bastian" have make it to the Oscar's? No, but it made it to my blog, which is basically the equivalent, if not better. In this post, I'm going to share some of my favorite parts of our short film, as well as some behind-the-scenes choices we made that I think really impacted the finished product. Synopsis During a normal day of school, ...
Comments
Post a Comment